View Single Post
Old 08-20-2008, 10:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Sir Amsterdam
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,667
Default Re: The Ring Magazine's top 10 p4p

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550 View Post
A little different from my list, but it's decent. Hopkins should be removed first and foremost (2-3 in his last 5 fights doesn't warrant a 4 spot). Replace him with either Chad Dawson or David Haye. Nate Campbell or Joan Guzman will deserve a spot in a couple weeks.

I don't agree with Rafael Marquez being above Cotto, but I see why they have him ahead nonetheless.

Skill-wise, Mijares is number one in my book, but his level of competition isn't quite enough to move him past other fighters who have signature wins over other P4P fighters. Give him a year or so and he'll skyrocket once he beats Montiel and another top fighter around 115 (say maybe a Darchinyan or Donaire).

I actually agree with Margarito being above Pavlik. Obviously Pavlik has more technical skill, throws straighter punches, and has a better defense, but Margarito's win over Cotto is the best win between the two. Taylor, at the time Pavlik beat him, was not ranked among the top 10 pound for pound. And their secondary set of wins falls to Margarito based on having beat Clottey and Cintron whereas Pavlik has Miranda and Zuniga, neither of whom have ever held a title belt. With that said, if you want to put Pavlik ahead of Margarito, I don't have a problem with it.
I agree with this, but no issue on Pavlik, all of the silly people that are overrating this overrated, 1 dimensional shaky chinned fighter are soon to be surprised at how easily Hopkins deals with him. He's made for Hopkins.

Then maybe I can see Hopkins as a legit top 12, at best.

And before people bring up how I called Marg-Cotto wrong due to Marg being limited and 1 dimensional, it has no relevance here, as Marg's chin is perhaps titanium and despite having less skill, is rarely put off balance when misses, like Pavlik is. Pavlik's the most overrated fighter in the sport... 1 dimensional, highly bruisable, low defence without a great chin to back it up etc... sloppy... this all extends to how overrated Taylor was however.
Sir Amsterdam is offline   Reply With Quote